Which principle is violated when a contract contains ambiguities?

When a contract contains ambiguities, it primarily violates the principle of clarity. The principle of clarity emphasizes the need for clear and unambiguous language within a contract so that all parties understand their rights and obligations without confusion. Ambiguities can lead to varying interpretations of the terms, potentially resulting in disputes and misunderstandings between the parties involved.

In the context of contracts, clarity ensures that all parties have the same understanding of the terms, facilitating smoother transactions and reducing the potential for conflict. A contract that lacks clarity can undermine trust and effective communication, which are essential for any binding agreement. Hence, the existence of ambiguities directly contradicts the expectation of clarity that is fundamental to the enforceability and effectiveness of contracts.